PhotoFiltreStudio as XaraXtreme?

Bug, suggestion, ça se passe par ici !
Ne concerne que ce qui touche au logiciel en lui même.

Modérateur : Modérateurs

Règles du forum
:idea: Forum d'aide au fonctionnement de PhotoFiltre et de PhotoFiltre Studio.
:idea: Merci de consulter la documentation de PF Studio, et de lire cette information, pour vous orienter.
Si vous êtes débutant, voir Comment me lancer. Votre question a peut-être déjà sa réponse.
carlo taradel
Régulier(ère)|Régulier|Régulière
Régulier(ère)|Régulier|Régulière
Messages : 271
Inscription : 10 oct. 2005 21:52
Version de PhotoFiltre : PF-PFS
Système d'exploitation : win XP pro- ubuntu_ breeze
Processeur : recycled from waste bin
Mémoire RAM : 1026
Localisation : Roma-Amsterdam-?

PhotoFiltreStudio as XaraXtreme?

Message par carlo taradel »

Sorry to post in english but i think this could be of general interest.
(hem somebody could translate please :oops: )

It's about PF\ PFS for Linux, i know very well the problems but maybe you didn't notice the advantages and the possible solution

Solution that could be the same of XaraXtrem:
Shareware (No free,no open source) for Windows, (...from there the money come ! :cool:) ,
Open source for Linux

See:
http://www.xara.com/products/xtreme/ (Shareware Windows version)
http://www.xaraxtreme.org/ ( for Linux Open Source release)

I think in this way you will not loose nothing but you will get
1 a lot of promotion everywhere
(in linux there is nothing as PF\ PFS ,there is Gimp that is too complex for many users ...and few other SW too simple and limited even for the most dumb user... you will be the second after XARA to make a similar jump, Xara get really a lot of promotion in all the world for this)

2 A lot of volunteers willing to fully support the Linux port
(and good chance to get ,as by-product enhancement that could be ported from linux to the win version)

3) a lot of happy Linux\PF users

4) all your right untouched for all the windows version

Will be not beautiful? :roll:
Heis Spiter
Administrateur(trice)|Administrateur|Administratrice
Administrateur(trice)|Administrateur|Administratrice
Messages : 2038
Inscription : 28 oct. 2003 13:39
Version de PhotoFiltre : 6.2.7/9.0.0
Système d'exploitation : Windows XP Pro SP2
Processeur : Intel Pentium IV 3.2 Ghz HT
Mémoire RAM : 1536 Mo DDR
Localisation : 63

Message par Heis Spiter »

It's already the solution used by Xchat for their IRC client. I've never understood why. In fact, it's the same client on Linux and Windows, but Windows one is shareware, and Linux one free (and GPL !). What does explain cost of Windows version ?

That's not because we're under Windows we should pay for every program we want to use whereas Linux user can have it for free. If you can help me, because I just wonder why it's always thinked that every Windows user is so rich that he can pay for every think.

In my mind, if Windows version is free, Linux version should be to. And if Windows version is shareware, Linux version should be to. But, but, but, PhotoFiltre isn't mine, so let's see what Antonio think about that ;).
carlo taradel
Régulier(ère)|Régulier|Régulière
Régulier(ère)|Régulier|Régulière
Messages : 271
Inscription : 10 oct. 2005 21:52
Version de PhotoFiltre : PF-PFS
Système d'exploitation : win XP pro- ubuntu_ breeze
Processeur : recycled from waste bin
Mémoire RAM : 1026
Localisation : Roma-Amsterdam-?

Message par carlo taradel »

That's not because we're under Windows we should pay for every program we want to use whereas Linux user can have it for free. If you can help me, because I just wonder why it's always thinked that every Windows user is so rich that he can pay for every think.
Basically i think if you don't want get your hand dirty you are supposed to find somebody doing the job for you.(as a software you want)

In Win this usually means pay somebody to do that job

In Linux (to be correct in Open Source) you can find people available to do that job you need for free....BUT they will work only when they like...they will do the job only in the way THEY like...and at the condition that all the "how to" of their job will be pubblically available.

If you will try to complain that they are to slow they will just invite YOU to work more ...or hire somebody else quicker.

Often the final result is even better then the paied one (see FireFox or OpenOffice) but you get no garancy about...neither you can complain or ask the money back

(Still from the eyes of somebody that paied for a similar job, you can get the same or even better result for free (IF you get a result.at all..)

if a community works for free to develop, improve , port,test a software is normal that they pretend to use it for free, at least on their free Operative Sistem

"Linux" community get Xara for free also becouse they are developing (porting) Xara for free,and even many "average"users are spending time to fill bug reports forms and testing unstable software that could even crash their computer...

Xara developer support them , but most of the work is done buy unpaid volunteers (and within the timeframe of free unpaied volunteers )

At the end the Linux_Xara could be even better then the 50E Win Version..just now nobody could complain for crash, bug or missed feature
(if they do STANDARD ANSWER is ready
: you are right ,Please write a patch to fix the code !...

Basic point to me is that Xara didn't do for charity but to avoid to be killed or eaten by Adobe...and also freeware and shareware developers want the same thing

Please note also that is possible also sell software for Linux , even if usually what most linux users are willing to pay for is only services and customized support and not the software itself..