dessin crayon + aquarelle - in PF 6.11
Publié : 15 avr. 2005 20:32
First, thanks Cath for the great idea and the tuto
I tested this on the Cath winter photo
I spent two evenings with trials in 6.11 and this is the result:
Crayon:
Copy the image twice
make a negativ from copy 1
make a negativ and gaussian blur 7-9 (as in Cath tuto)
open arithmetic plugin and write this formula:
(i1*55+i2*100+i3*50)/100
//i1 is gausian negative, i2 is original, i3 is normal negative
If you did not desaturate it before, the result is colored, so you can do it now, it does not matter
The value for the first image controls the result - good value is somewhere between 55 - 52 depending on your picture
aquarel:
make the crayon as above
corrections gama 0.10 for the result (as in Cath tuto)
apply comix filter on the original (bande desinee)
open arithmetic plugin and write this formula:
(i1*60+i2*100)/140
or the famous Pascal formula can be used instead: (i1*40+i2*70)/100
//i1 original , i2 crayon
the result is very light, apply gama- several times
I tried it without the "bande desinee" effect and it looked good, too (in fact, I liked it more)
I had problem with the "pink" effect, The only solution I found, was: select white with magic wand, invert selection, apply color
the other efect are the same (photomasque, structure ...), I think
the result of the aquarel formula without "bande desinee" looks like this (before gama correction) : http://photofiltre.suewebik.net/galerie ... uarel1.jpg
the result with "bande desinee" and some effect applied is here
(I was too lazy to apply the mask)
http://photofiltre.suewebik.net/galerie ... uarel2.jpg
The result is similar but not the same - I am afraid, I did not use the correct balance in the second formula
I tested this on the Cath winter photo
I spent two evenings with trials in 6.11 and this is the result:
Crayon:
Copy the image twice
make a negativ from copy 1
make a negativ and gaussian blur 7-9 (as in Cath tuto)
open arithmetic plugin and write this formula:
(i1*55+i2*100+i3*50)/100
//i1 is gausian negative, i2 is original, i3 is normal negative
If you did not desaturate it before, the result is colored, so you can do it now, it does not matter
The value for the first image controls the result - good value is somewhere between 55 - 52 depending on your picture
aquarel:
make the crayon as above
corrections gama 0.10 for the result (as in Cath tuto)
apply comix filter on the original (bande desinee)
open arithmetic plugin and write this formula:
(i1*60+i2*100)/140
or the famous Pascal formula can be used instead: (i1*40+i2*70)/100
//i1 original , i2 crayon
the result is very light, apply gama- several times
I tried it without the "bande desinee" effect and it looked good, too (in fact, I liked it more)
I had problem with the "pink" effect, The only solution I found, was: select white with magic wand, invert selection, apply color
the other efect are the same (photomasque, structure ...), I think
the result of the aquarel formula without "bande desinee" looks like this (before gama correction) : http://photofiltre.suewebik.net/galerie ... uarel1.jpg
the result with "bande desinee" and some effect applied is here
(I was too lazy to apply the mask)
http://photofiltre.suewebik.net/galerie ... uarel2.jpg
The result is similar but not the same - I am afraid, I did not use the correct balance in the second formula