Comparison PF7 to PFSX, which Features are missing?

[Pac-Man]

Hi there,

I recently saw you released PhotoFiltre 7, which looks very similar to PFS X for me. I didn't miss a feature I would've used in PFS X.
Will the feature set of this PF7 version remain? What features are exactly not included in PF7? A comparison table would be nice

Greetings,
Pac-Man

[Antonio]

it is in progress...

[dvip]

Hi there,

I recently saw you released PhotoFiltre 7, which looks very similar to PFS X for me. I didn't miss a feature I would've used in PFS X.
Will the feature set of this PF7 version remain? What features are exactly not included in PF7? A comparison table would be nice

Greetings,
Pac-Man

.8bf don't work?
There is a 8bf.pfl and a Raw.pfl.

[Antonio]

yes, it is a bug with the first setup, i fixed it yesterday. PF7 don't support 8BF/Raw

[Antonio]

Functions removed compared to PhotoFiltre Studio X

Animated Gif
Vectorial Path
PhotoPNG

RAW Format
8BF Filters

Tool Nozzles
Tool Deform
Tool Retouch (red eye, ...)
Advaced and Inverse Eraser

Border effects for layers

[Pac-Man]

This is awesome, my friends won't need the features which are removed.
On the other side you should also get their money.
I tell them to get PFSX

[Tom]

Automatic transparent gradients of the Layer menu aren't available in the 7 version, too.
It is possible to manage the transparency gradient with a mask pasted in the Alpha channel.
But for my own experience of photo retouching, it's a feature which greatly justifies to get the Studio release.

[Pac-Man]

Isn't plugin support "dangerous" at all in PF7? You could put in mostly all the missing features of the PFSX version.

[dvip]

I think PF7 should support 8BF, it can be used in Paint.net and Gimp
and we want PF7 to be better than Paint.Net
PF7 and 6.5.3 are excellent!

[Antonio]

it is a suicide for the Studio version